Addressing the Multitudes

The Holy Land. It was not as barren as the movies make it out to be. Instead of sandy crags and rocky outcrops, Jesus traversed a land filled with grassy hillsides, fields, and trees. You might say it was a kind of terrain that echoed less well. As we know, Jesus often spoke outdoors in open fields and on grassy hillsides.

We also know that Jesus was rarely followed by a singular multitude. More often than not, his following was named, not in the singular, as in a multitude, but rather in the plural, as in multitudes.

I am in Luke 14, beginning at verse 25, where the multitudes are following Jesus, where Jesus turns to address them. How does one address such a large gathering?

First of all, Jesus would have had to have a good set of lungs. He would need to be able to speak over the milling noises associated with crowds. He could not depend on the acoustics of canyon walls.

Second of all, his speaking manner would have had to be slow and deliberate, with ample pauses to let his words sink in. In effect, Jesus would have turned and shouted at the crowd. It may only be me, but when I hear shouting, my first association is with anger. To my ear, some of the more robust languages, like German and Spanish, sound perpetually angry.

I can, of course, imagine an alternative means of delivery. With his inner circle strategically placed, the message could then have been passed front to back systematically. Here, I am thinking of how Jesus ordered his multitudes – as in groups of fifty, as in the miracle of the fish and loaves. Still, this incident in Luke has all the hallmarks of spontaneity.

Was Jesus annoyed with his crowd? It is like he suddenly wheeled on them and said, “You know, you can't just follow me around like puppies! Following me means going where I go, even to the cross. If you can't commit, you should leave now.”

We see it, too. They were wide-eyed amazed. Jesus was a marvel. He healed the sick, raised the dead, sent evil spirits packing, and stood up to the Pharisees with unheard of authority. And, the things he said – wow!

Many of us, today, are no more than those same wide-eyed followers. We have the same reasons for being followers – and we are just as uncommitted. Jesus doesn't want puppies for followers. If all we seek is a pat on the head, or a bone, or a treat, we are just underfoot.

We are all the multitudes. We've all heard the sermons; we've all heard the parables. But, there is a limit to how much, or how loud, one can shout. Does any of it get through to you? It is you who have a choice to make. It is you who must commit to the calling. No one is going to do it for you. Only you can make it so.

Go Up Higher

I come now to Luke 14. I think, now, as opposed to my topical beginning, I have become comfortable moving chapter to chapter and verse to verse. It is still my intention to set forward the definition upon which a subject must be judged. We must know what it is we believe – and why. At any rate, the first 24 verses of this chapter deal with a single scenario.

Jesus was invited to eat at the house of an unnamed Chief Pharisee on a Sabbath day. For well over half a chapter, Jesus talks to Pharisees and lawyers. Many people had been invited, and it seems they were there to 'observe'. In that regard, it is notable that no one argued with Jesus or seemed to be angered by his discourse.

Challenges were made which no one there was able to refute. They had no answer. Also, two separate parables were told. But first, let us get a feel for the topography of the situation. Let's map it out. What kind of deal was this meal? It sort of jumps out at me that Jesus spent a lot of time in the company of the Pharisees. If Jesus wasn't preaching in a Synagogue on a Sabbath, he quite likely could be found in the home of some Pharisee.

This Pharisee's house seems quite large as it has many rooms for many guests. For that matter, unless it was a big town, some of the guests would have had to be visiting from neighboring provinces. They would have had to be invited in advance. Jesus was going town to town on his way to Jerusalem. This could have been voiced ahead, giving these people ample opportunity to assemble. I get the sense that it was planned. Moreover, since Jesus addressed the man who invited him on the topic of throwing a feast, I must assume that is exactly what the Pharisee had done.

All of them wanted to observe the sensation that was Jesus. They wanted to hear him speak and get a sense of who he was. Here are some things to consider. Most of Jesus' contentions were with the Pharisees. In most of the occasions where we find Jesus invited to eat at someone's home, it is a Pharisee that invites him. Most of the times that Pharisees are offended by Jesus, it is due to Jesus not doing things the Pharisee way. One has to ask: who was more of a threat to the Pharisee order – some layman out in the boonies, or a rogue Pharisee?

I am not here to give a sermon. Although I have dealt with many of the parables already, I will leave these for the preachers. I am here to map out the floor tiles upon which we stand. In other words, the foundation upon which our beliefs stand.

I half expected one of the Pharisees to complain that Jesus healed a man on the Sabbath. I find it curious that, among so many prominent dignitaries, there was found among them someone of the less fortunate. Dropsy. Edema would be no easy thing to cure, especially in a moment as Jesus had done. The man would have been all puffy from the accumulation of fluids as a result of any number of physical ailments. It is as if they had it all planned – and that might well explain why Jesus seemed so perfunctory in his healing of the man. “He took him, and healed him, and let him go.”

Finally, I just want to touch briefly on the concepts of humility, exaltation, and worship. Self-exaltation is something none of us appreciate – when it is found in another. It smacks of pride, willfulness, conceit, vainglory, vanity, and narcissism – all the things we hate to be accused of. Humility, however, is something we pride ourselves on. I guess what I am trying to point out is a right spirit versus a wrong spirit, a right mind versus a wrong mind, or even a good attitude versus a bad attitude.

When one keeps one's nose to the proverbial grindstone, one does not end up with less nose. Humility goes hand in hand with persistence – that is, humility as a daily practice. A good habit. We might even look at humility as leaving yourself elbow room, or room for improvement. When you go up higher, it is because someone who matters thinks you matter. Those around you will be impressed.

Worship. Normally, we place this one out of reach. It is only something we do to God or Jesus. But according to Jesus, it is a common state – being impressed, having admiration for, or finding joy in the fortuitous turn. When a gambler puts all his money on a single bet and loses, he loses big. Have we given ourselves the elbow room we need to go up higher?

Stages

I did not fully cover the last set of verses, so I will include verse 30 in this study. Luke 13:30-35 puts several small points under the magnifying glass. There are points like a 'prophet in Jerusalem', 'being perfected', 'time', and the way reality is 'ordered'. I begin with the latter point in verse 30.

First last and last first – that's just how reality rolls. I write, here, in the broader sense. Of course, we recall the parable of the last workers being paid first, and we think in terms of how one might enter the kingdom – indeed, we think of our place among the many who have placed their hopes in Jesus.

First last and last first is what I like to call a USM, that is to say, a Universal Spiritual Mechanic. It is a law that regulates how things work. Here, I would like the reader to picture in his mind the working of a pendulum. Envision the full scope of the pendulum as encompassing all there is. It moves from the one extreme to the opposite extreme and back again.

Let us call the one extreme 'first' and the opposite extreme 'last'. When the pendulum reaches 'last' and begins its return to the other end, it begins with the last. It is in that broader USM context that the last may be the first. Other models which explain the same mechanic are the 'Lemniscate', or the infinity symbol, and the Yin Yang symbol.

Next in our study, Jesus received Pharisees who warned him of Herod's intent to kill him. Jesus already had an audience when the Pharisees came to him. He had been going town to town teaching, and as we know, Jesus always had a crowd around him. When he answered the Pharisees, it seems as though he was also still speaking for the benefit of the multitude that traveled with him. In my mind, I have to picture the Pharisees pressing into the crowd, having to work their way to the center to reach Jesus.

When Jesus says that he must walk today and tomorrow and the third, to be perfected, it sounds to me like an explanation of the concept of 'stages'. One works toward perfection in stages, doing more and more, getting better and better, going higher and higher, until the goal is reached. Higher is a stage of development, better is a one-up within an ongoing process, more is an increased result in a series of actions or steps.

Stages and goals may both be filed under being a prophet in Jerusalem. It is clear from his own words that Jesus viewed, accepted, or at least promoted himself as a prophet in Jerusalem. From his answer to the Pharisees, Jesus went on in an oratory fashion to speak exactly like a prophet. One has to ask, at what stage of spiritual development must a man be in order to speak as a prophet of God?

Jesus mentioned only three stages: today, tomorrow, and the third day. In the first two days, Jesus is walking, or working (as in cures). In the third day he is also working (as in the final stage of the process of perfection). We think of the three days in the belly of the earth. We think of his public ministry, his crucifixion/resurrection and ascension. We must assume that the very fact of Jesus saying there was a 'today' means that he placed himself, not at the end, not in the middle, but at the beginning.

Let us examine the nature of his prophet's oration. If any of you have read extensively in the old testament, you may note a correlation between how Jesus spoke and how the angels spoke. In both cases they spoke as if they were God himself. To any who are unfamiliar with the nature of angelic discourse, return to the old testament and read of the angel speaking to Moses from the burning bush. The fact that Jesus speaks to Jerusalem as if God is speaking should clue us in to the stage of Jesus' spiritual progress.

Finally, some thoughts on the word 'perfected'. What is the common view on the concept of perfection? Not everyone in this world considers that concept to be relevant, but among those that do, Christians seem confused on the point. The Christ they believe in and follow said, “Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.” That is a direct command. One must assume that would only be predicated on an established and verifiable truth – that man can indeed be perfect. Yet most contemporary Christians are fond of the addendum, 'I am not perfect'. They prefer the 'sinner saved by grace' stage of spiritual development.

Neither was it only the son of God who commanded us to be perfect. In Genesis 17:1 God himself told Abraham, “Walk before me, and be thou perfect.” In Leviticus 19:2 God himself told all of Israel, “Ye shall be Holy, for I the Lord your God am Holy.” It must be a consensus around the throne that the perfection of man is totally do-able. Mankind, however, including many Christians, seem not to believe the word of God. Rather, the common view of perfection is a mish-mash of super abilities with an absolutely negative amount of mistakes and ailments.

Therein lies the lament. O Jerusalem, Jerusalem – which is to say, O man! How can man be saved when he stubbornly clings to his own ways? When we take the truth of God and redefine it, what hope is there? We may not do God's way our way. That just doesn't work. Jesus knew what level he was playing on – some of us aren't even in the game. If I asked you, would you know? What stage of spiritual development are you at?

To Stand Without

Although I have written on this topic before, I have some thoughts to express here on Luke 13:22-30.

While Jesus was going from town to town in his advance upon Jerusalem, someone asked him, 'are there many saved?' Jesus responded that we should strive to enter the strait gate. This is not where he compares the narrow way that leads to life with the broad way that leads to destruction. That is found in Matthew 7:14.

Here, Jesus explained that the gate would be open just a short while, and his advice was that they should seize the opportunity. Indeed, there was a limited window of availability. Once the gate closed, there would be no further possibility of entry.

This is actually a warning to 'whosoever will.' If you want in, don't let the door close on you. It is also a statement that defines the type of people who will be forever 'locked out of' the kingdom of God. While it appears, from the text, that Jesus is speaking directly to the Jews, it is more a model of the type that believes he or she has a golden ticket to heaven – an irrevocable surety.

Jesus cites the Jewish mindset inasmuch as the Jewish mindset rested in the cultural and blood connection to the patriarchs. The model, then, is a person whose rests in something of this world rather a spiritual reality. By this I mean such solid connections as lineage, religious order, Synagogue/church/Mosque and the limited laws, practices, or traditions of such.

The Jew believes his fast track into the kingdom is found in Abraham, the law of Moses, the Synagogue. The Christian holds his to be Sunday worship and tithes. The Muslim thinks Mohamed's teachings will bring him to paradise. There is all sorts of hand waving involved – or sword waving as the case may be. But Jesus says there is a very narrow window of opportunity that will not always be open.

Jesus described himself as 'the way.' That is to say, he is the way into the kingdom of God. That is an avenue not all are inclined to travel. I like to say that the way is only open to those who are open to the way. A major downfall of the three faiths listed above is the underdog. Every one of those three religions has an underdog. Sometimes, they are called gentiles. Sometimes, they are called infidels. They are the Samaritans, the dogs, the other guy. They are always that poor red-headed stepchild that just doesn't meet the standard.

However, according to the son of God, the major religions, who assume they have a sure in, will find the door locked. They will knock in alarm and make such claims as their connections allow. You taught in our streets, we are the children of Abraham, we obeyed the laws of Moses, we went to church, we killed the infidel. They will see the kingdom of God filling, but not with them. Others will come from the east and west, from every nation and people – and it will always be the red-headed stepchild.

If the way is open to all ages and times from the slain lamb to the coming king, how can it be also closed? The answer, of course, is that it is only closed to those who are closed to the way. The way is Jesus. I'll say it again – the way is Jesus. Yet, I even must warn the Christian. To the Christian I say, the way, the only way, is Jesus. That does not mean that repeatedly saying his name is a golden ticket. The only way into the kingdom is to follow the path that Jesus took. You have to be a Jesus.

And you can't do that with the mind of the world.

The Spirit of Infirmity

Let's talk about miracles. It is a small account found in Luke 13:10-17 that describes the healing of a woman on a Sabbath and in a Synagogue. If this study dealt with the religious issues involved, I might write about the confrontation between Jesus and the leader of the Synagogue. I might highlight the shaming of Jesus' adversaries or the rejoicing of Jesus' followers.

This study has a narrow focus, however, as I wish to deal more precisely with the miracle itself. It will be my argument that whatever state the spirit is in the body will acquiesce to. Jesus had power over the spirits. When he delivered a person from an evil spirit, he often named them. If a possessed man could not talk, Jesus identified the spirit as he called it out: “Thou dumb and deaf spirit,” Mark 9:25.

In knowing this, we may better understand the spirit he dealt with on that Sabbath day with the afflicted woman. Here is what the verse says, Luke 13:11, “And, behold, there was a woman which had a spirit of infirmity eighteen years, and was bowed together, and could in no wise lift up herself.”

These are clues the seeker may use to understand the truth that links spirit and flesh. We may assume that if a spirit is dumb and deaf, the flesh is dumb and deaf. We may assume that if a spirit is bent, the body, likewise, is bent. If the flesh mirrors the condition of the spirit, we may view the description of the physical ailment as an accurate description of the spirit as well. How was the woman's body described? For eighteen years she was unable to lift herself up, that is to stand straight. She was described as being 'bowed together'. In a later verse, this condition is further described as being 'bound' – as in chained or shackled.

One interesting synonym for 'infirmity' – as it reflects upon a more nearly spiritual aspect – is the word 'indisposition,' which is defined thus: “Lack of enthusiasm or inclination; reluctance.” Synonyms of a more strictly physical bearing include, 'weakness,' 'illness,' 'frailty,' disease.'

The description of being 'bowed together' offers up an image of someone suffering from osteoporosis.

My argument, as I have said, is that the condition of the body mirrors the condition of the spirit. Some people, I realize, will have a difficult time making the mental connection between such physical ailments and 'spirits.' Indeed, these people have a difficult time with the concept, as simple as it is, of a spirit. I'll say it again – mentality and spirituality are one and the same.

What binds the mind binds the flesh. The miracle for that bent woman was that she could stand straight again. The miracle for those of us seeking truth is that we now see Jesus healing spirits rather than bodies. We see the son of God, who is one with his spiritual father, as having power and authority over anything and everything spiritual.

Are You the Bigger Sinner?

We turn our attention now to Luke 13:1-9. In these verses are found mention of certain sinners who died. It was commonly believed that these people died because of their sins. It was thought that their deaths were punishments for sins so heinous they simply could not be overlooked. The sins and subsequent deaths of these people were spoken in hushed dread as warnings to quickly depart the wayward path.

Two sets of sinners are mentioned. First, there was the unnumbered group of Galilaeans whose blood was mixed with Roman sacrifices. It is not told how or why they died, but it is interesting to note that the blood sacrifices of the Romans are mentioned in such a matter-of-fact manner. Pilate is mentioned as either performing the evil action or having ordered it done.

Second, there were the eighteen people upon whom the tower of Siloam fell. Both sets of people were seen to have died an ignominious death. It is human nature 101 to have a bad reaction to a bad death. Jesus posed the question: were these people necessarily more sinful than anyone else? It is within these same verses that Jesus points out that all of us stand to die a similar death – unless we repent.

So, is Jesus saying that a tower will fall on us or that our blood will be used in unholy rites? No. He is simply saying that every sinner dies. Some die horribly, some seem not to deserve such an end, but there is a common thread running through each occurrence. An unrepentant dead sinner is no longer able to repent. All opportunities for repentance become unavailable after death.

Jesus, in his usual fashion, turned it all upon those who brought the matter up. He laid out for them, and for us by extension, the whole nine yards of sin and repentance, of second chances and extended grace. He did this in his signature vehicle of delivery: the parable.

Did anyone understand the parable? Do any of us? Do we get it, and if so, do we apply it to our own lives? On many levels, the unfruitful tree is symbolic of the life that is unconnected to God – a willful independent spirit that moves and acts contrary to the will of God. The natural and immediate determination is to remove the unfruitful tree as it is only taking up space that would be better used for anything that gave a return on the investment.

The parable shows us an advocate for the unfruitful tree, a champion who offers us that one final chance to turn it all around. Jesus is that champion who offers second chances to the unrepentant and unfruitful thing that just takes up space. Are you that one? Accept the help; it is a limited-time offer. If, after this, you remain unfruitful, you will be cut down. You have this time, as it is said, 'Now is the accepted time; now is the day of salvation; the acceptable year of the Lord.'

“Lord, let it alone this year also . . . and if it bear fruit, well: and if not, then after that thou shalt thou shalt cut it down.” Take this final time to turn it all around. A falling tower may not be your demise; what's left of you after death may not be violated, but you will surely die in your sins with no remaining opportunities for change.

Fire on the Earth

Luke 12:49-51 gives us a quote from Jesus. It is not only an expression of his purpose but a fair description of the process of spiritual advancement. We look at the major religions of our day and age and we can't help but compare Christianity to Islam.

Islam is a religion out of which any individual may eventually decide for a stricter interpretation. Islam is a religion that may at any moment devolve into the blood lust and violence of Jihad.

Christianity is a religion that attempts to circumvent these flaws of human nature through love.

At least, that is the general consensus. Islam is all judgment and bloodshed while Christianity seeks a cozy state of peaceful coexistence.

According to the statements found in Luke 12: 49 and 51, the Christian process is anything but cozy. Let us examine the actual words of Jesus.

One: 'Do you suppose that I have come to bring peace? I tell you, no, but rather division.'

Two: 'I have come to send fire on the earth.'

This looks very much like judgment. In fact, Jesus continues on to describe how families will be divided. Some will believe; some will not believe. Clashes of this nature are never pretty.

About that fire – Jesus indicated that it had already been kindled. The spirit of some had already begun to pull away, to seek something other. Jesus merely fanned the flames.

Jesus indicated he faced the same thing. It was a sort of baptism by fire that all who seek spiritual advancement must face. It is the painfully bitter birth pang of an ascendant. Spirit. 'Birth pangs', as applied to the process of spiritual advancement and the future of our world refers to certain convulsive geopolitical, geophysical, astrophysical and world-wide socio-economic events.

There is a process called winnowing. That is where the fruit of the harvest is shaken up to remove all things undesirable. The wind of the ascendant spirit is the key agent in this process. As is said in Luke 12:57, each individual must ultimately develop to the point where they are able to judge what is right and good for themselves.

I say 'for themselves' to bring attention to the difference between undeveloped judgment and developed judgment. When we initially burn with enthusiasm, when we have allowed others to affect our inexperience, we engage in a form of judgment that is devoid of spiritual development and wisdom.

The infant may kick in the womb, but walking comes after the pangs of birth, where even more development is slated to follow. The newly enlivened may cry loudly, but the voice must be developed in time and with patient practice. The life must die many deaths and be restored through many trials by fire before a developed judgment and wisdom are attainable.

There is now, and will continue to be, violence in this world. When we compare the religions of Christianity and Islam, we see that judgment is involved in both. One must not be quick to allow another to motivate them. Rather, one must seek the winnowing wind of their own spiritual advancement. One must see that voices of others and their own voice are never the same. One's own voice, one's own ability to judge, will only develop from a fiery baptism.

Of that fiery baptism, Jesus said, “How I am straitened till it be accomplished.”

Strait is a noun. It is a narrow passage of water connecting two seas or two large areas of water. Jesus indicated being pressed between one certainty and another, as in The Strait of Gibraltar, as in being poised for the becoming, the transition. One synonym of strait is channel.

Strait is also used in reference to a situation characterized by a specified degree of trouble or difficulty. (The economy is in dire straits.) Some synonyms are a bad or difficult situation, difficulty, trouble, crisis, a mess, a predicament, a plight.

As I said, judgment is employed in both religions, but how does one reach the judgment stage? Does a person simply choose the form of judgment over a time-developed judgment? That would be a poor substitute. The agony of becoming. The absolute necessity the fiery baptism. Winnowing is built into the system. Ultimately, the desired spirit will prevail and the unnecessary chaff will be discarded.

Can you think for yourselves? Or, will you always be swayed by your preachers and imams? I urge you to the straitened path of spiritual development, to division from the chaff, to the fiery baptism and birth pangs of an individual who is wholly able to judge what is good and right. I urge you to reach judgment through love. I urge you to disavow the tools of bloodlust and violence. A rash and immediate fire is never the better choice.

There has always been a fire on the earth, Jesus just fanned the flames. It is the fire of spiritual discernment, of seeking what is good and right on our own. It is division from distractions and detours, from subjection to the will of undeveloped spirits in other people. It is a march, not of the many, but of the individual. It is a certain forward advancement of the spirit of each becoming man, woman, and child.

Preparations

Luke 12:39-48 brings up the matter of just who needs to make preparations. This study begins with the statement: “If the goodman of the the house had known what hour the thief would come, he would have watched, and not have suffered his house to be broken through.” So, I begin with these questions: Who is the goodman of the house? Is he the owner or the watchman? Does 'his house' refer to ownership or the responsibility of a servant?

Recall from the previous study that Jesus had spoken of the preparations of a landowner who pulled down his small barn to build a bigger barn. Jesus indicated these preparations were not of the best inclination. Recall, also, that Jesus said such things (concerning the best inclination) as, “ Let your loins be girded about and your lights burning.” He admonished them to, first and foremost, 'seek the kingdom of God.' What does that say to us? It says 'make the proper preparations.'

Within the context of this present study, Jesus speaks a parable and Peter asks a question. The parable was about the goodman of the house. The question was this: “Speakest thou this parable unto us,” (the disciples) “or even to all?” Jesus had just issued a challenge: “Be ye therefore ready also: for the Son of man cometh at an hour when ye think not.”

In response to the question – 'is that for everyone or just for us?' – Jesus asked Peter a question. It went like this: 'who is the servant entrusted with the care of the master's house?' In other words, 'who is the goodman of the house?' Jesus dropped two clues about the identity of this servant, and also described the servant's duties. First, the ones to whom the parable was intended, aside from being servants, were supposed to be both 'wise' and 'faithful' – stewards in the truest sense of the word.

A steward is a top-level servant. There is usually only one per house, and that servant oversees the duties and needs of all who reside in the master's house. That includes the master, the heir of the father, guests, and others servants. To each of those in the list, the steward is charged to give them their portion of meat in due season. Everyone has a place and a position and a season. First is the master and his family. Next, come the guests and friends of the master. Last to be served are the steward and his fellow servants.

In all the house, this one servant bears the most comprehensive responsibility. It is actually a position of trust. Everyone depends on the steward. He can ill afford to let anyone down; he must wear whichever hat he is handed. The steward is the goodman of the house and is even responsible for household security. This individual must be faithful enough to stand for the whole house, ensuring all are encompassed in the will of the master. This individual must be wise enough to prepare for all eventualities.

Like the subject of this study, the subject of stewardship is wise and faithful preparedness. Yes, Jesus directed this parable to his disciples – as if he had said, “Yes, Peter, I mean this one for you.” Those who take to themselves the responsibilities of stewardship must be able to devote themselves to it wholeheartedly. Stewardship cuts two ways – like a shiny new knife. It rejoices the heart, and it is good and useful but it can also make a grievous wound with one careless slip.

Jesus indicated that there are great rewards built into the service: do good and the master, himself, will come forth and serve you your portion. A great honor, but not only that – a relaxed and confident mindset that frees one to commit one's full attention to the job. Jesus also indicated severe penalties for those who violate their trust in any way.

The failure of a steward may include sleeping on your watch, hoarding, withholding, late fulfillment of duties, or anything from inappropriate behavior to blatant abuse of those in your charge. You can expect exactly what Jesus described. You will be cut into pieces. There will be no part of you that may depend on another part of you. Severed from any help you might provide for yourself, you will also be on the outside of all others when it comes to helping or even caring. You will be appointed your portion with the enemies of the house. You will be both an enemy of the house and an enemy of the enemy, for they will despise you as well.

So, what is the difference between “unto us”, (disciples, servants, stewards) and “even to all”? Jesus put it this way in verses 47-48: “And that servant, which knew his lord's will, and prepared not himself, neither did according to his will, shall be beaten with many stripes. But he that knew not, and did commit things worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with few stripes.”

The reasoning follows, and it is a thing our own life-experience can validate, “For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more.”

We know from other parables that the master of the house is a king who utterly destroys his enemies. We know also that talents given to servants will be required again with interest. Stewardship is not an occupation to enter into lightly. The question we must ask ourselves is this: are we prepared? We may also rightly ask ourselves: do we even know what the preparations are?

Do you doubt yourself? Have you concerns? Compare yourself to Jesus. Jesus is the heir to the father and himself said in John 10:30 “I and my Father are one.” If we know one thing about the son of his father, we know this, Jesus was a people person. His people skills were second to none. He was inclusive; he loved and forgave, but like his Father, he laid into his enemies without hesitation, without pulling his punches. Be like Jesus; Jesus was the model steward.

This study should stand as a stark warning to the governments of this world. A government is no more than a steward, a servant of the people. Governments are not here for themselves. They may not abuse the people in any way. Penalties await the failed steward. Good advice: unearth the preparations you need, realize them faithfully and wisely.

Rich Toward God

I continue here in Luke, chapter twelve. There are many verses to consider in this study; they are verses 15 through 38. I hope to condense these verses and wring from them a more concise sense of meaning.

Here are the verses of main import:

Luke 12:15, “Take heed, and beware of covetousness: for a man's life does not consist of the abundance of his possessions.”

Luke 12:21, “So is he that lays up treasure for himself, but is not rich toward God.”

Luke 12:38, “And if he shall come in the second watch, or come in the third watch, and find them so, blessed are those servants.”

Between verses 15 and 21, Jesus told them about covetousness in the parable of a farmer who already had plenty for himself, but desired more. That 'more' was the fruit of his own labors. Everything he possessed or worked to manage, he himself had labored to obtain. The fact is, the man in the parable did not covet anything that belonged to other people, he was simply trying to get things set up for his retirement.

The man in the parable pulled down his old small barns and built new larger barns so that there would be room for his continuing harvests. Perhaps the man was old, and after working all his life, looked forward to a time when he could have the things he needed, but no longer had to work. He just wanted to enjoy life.

This story strikes a chord with me, and might for others as well, as I work my final few years toward retirement. I've worked away my life and good health; I've paid my dues. I look forward to my golden years in which I may draw my checks and no longer have to work for other people.

The man in the parable set up his larger barns and thought to himself that he was finally set – he could now take his ease. That very night, after all of his hard work, and as if to spite his well-laid plans and earnest hopes, he died. Everything he owned went to others. It happens to the poor and to the well off. After we die, all we possess goes to other people. I have known people who hoped to finally take it easy, only to die a month or two into their retirements.

The man in the parable, in order to have so much, surely hired laborers to achieve the possessions he hoarded. There was excess. He could have blessed the less fortunate with it. He could have handed out holiday bonuses to his workers.

The point here is not that we are condemned for having stuff in this life. The point is that our life here cannot be the limit of our concerns. God is a spirit, and like a farmer who has planted his spirit within us, he expects a harvest. Like a lender, God expects a return on his investment. Many of us hope to lay his harvest before him, with joy at his return.

We can either be rich toward ourselves, or we can be rich toward God. We cannot be both. Being rich toward God is a mindset that is more open and free than being rich toward ourselves. Getting our fair share from this world is a limited way of thinking. It is an exclusive mindset.

Between verses 21 and 38, Jesus made several good points:

He revealed the hallmarks of an exclusive mindset and limited world view.

He suggested a winning strategy for the inclusively inclined.

He revealed the place, in these truths, of the returning God.

The inclusive mindset is just like the mind of God. It is a spiritual match to the returning God, and what he is returning to receive. It is important to recall that God is returning from a wedding. It is the wedding of his son. That wedding, itself, is a spirit of inclusion and represents a sort of melding or fusing of like to like.

God provides the needs of all from the right-minded man to the man who has crippled his mind and limited his thinking. God even provides the needs of the animals who cannot think beyond the moment of their physical urges. God knows what we need and is inclusively inclined. If we do not ignore the needs of other people (and that does not mean that we must be itinerant and possessionless) then we are on the same page with God. It's a match.

The inclusive mindset has much to look forward to and much to hope for. Those who make a point to be on the same page with God know that all the goods of this world will be added. On the other hand, the exclusive mindset, in its self-limitation, cannot look past the moment of its physical urge. It refuses to see anything but fleeting worldly goods – and its need to get it's fair share before they are gone. These have nothing to place their hope in but rust and moth and loss.

Those who are a match with the spirit that is God, who make a point to be on the same page with him, and place their hope in his inclusive return, know the joy of such a meld. It is always on their minds and in their thinking. They are vigilant and watchful. They make it their business and go about it with determination. They have a practice and they have their sights set on the culmination, not of their own labors and rewards, but those of the returning God.

Watches are mentioned in connection with the return. Watches were three-hour divisions of the night. Watching, in general, implied being alert. The second and third watches were the period of the night when most people were asleep and unaware. Those who watched were able to sound and alarm in times of need or trouble. Just as posted sentries might watch for the accepted approach of the enemy, the servant will await the accepted return of the Son of God who will include those happy souls as adopted children of the Father.

I did not give attention every verse in this study. I am trusting that you will read them for yourselves. I hope that you will do more than simply read them. Study them, reread them, compare them to my assessment. Know with all the certainty you can muster that God returns for you. If you seek the Kingdom of God, if your heart is in it, then you are rich toward God.

A Message for 2017

Jesus came away from his luncheon with the 'big boys' and warned his disciples of their hypocrisy. This is a message for the year 2017. We find this amazing note in Luke 12:1, “In the mean time, when there were gathered together an innumerable multitude of people, insomuch that they trode one upon another, he began to say unto his disciples first of all, beware ye the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy.”

Jesus called the Pharisees hypocrites. He described hypocrisy as leaven – a thing that swells, getting bigger and bigger. Two synonyms for the word hypocrite are 'fraud' and 'pretender'. The object of fraud is personal gain. Many accuse Christians, and the church in general, of hypocrisy while maintaining that they are spiritual, that they are believers, that they have a connection to God, vicariously, through concepts such as 'nature' and attitudes such as 'live and let live'. That, in itself, is hypocrisy.

We of our day and age may clearly see hypocrisy at work in Muslim radicals who claim the will of their God, yet murder, rape destroy, and pillage. The three major religions of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam share the same ten commandments with one exception, that the Sabbath observance is held by the Muslims to be a matter specific to the Jews. It is the core law of all three faiths and includes prohibitions on murder and theft. When terrorists and extremists use their faith to justify their bloodlust and many crimes what is evidenced is clearly hypocrisy.

I take this excerpt about the core laws of faith from an article in the Islamic Research Foundation International, Inc.; the article is authored by counselor Ahmad Kutty:

The Ten Commandments—with the exception of the fourth one, which deals with observance of the Sabbath—in essence and spirit constitute an integral part of the Qur’anic ethics and laws. The Qur’an presents itself as a book through which Allah has guided humankind to the noble ways of the previous prophets and messengers, who are to be emulated as the perfect role models of humanity. (See Qur’an 4:26; 6:90). Also, in a more fundamental sense, the Qur’an stresses that all the prophets and messengers, speaking different languages and raised in various times and places, taught essentially the same perennial religion (core religion called deen), although their precise promulgation of the laws of religion, responding to extremely divergent historical circumstances and milieu, assumed different forms. However, these fundamental commandments, in essence and spirit, belong to the perennial religion that allows for no abrogation or alteration. Although one hardly finds these commandments enumerated in a single place in the Qur’an as they are listed in the Torah, nevertheless, all of them with the exception of the rule to observe the Sabbath— which, according to the Qur’an, was specific to the Jews, and, therefore, has only a rather limited significance—are enumerated in various places with varying emphases in the Qur’an; hence one can safely conclude that these commandments are of universal relevance meant for all times and places. Here is a listing of these commandments as enumerated in the Bible with their parallels in the Qur’an:

1. In Bible, “You shall have no other gods before Me” (Exodus 20: 2-3); in the Qur’an: (Your Lord has commanded that you worship none but Him) (Al-Isra’ 17: 23).

2. In the Bible: “You shall not make unto you any graven image … You shall not bow down to them or worship” (Exodus 20: 4–5); in the Qur’an, (Therefore keep away from the defiling idols.) (Al-Hajj 22: 30).

3. In the Bible: “You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain” (Exodus 20: 7); In the Qur’an, (Make not Allah, by your oaths, a hindrance to your being righteous) (Al-Baqarah 2: 224).

4. In the Bible: “Honor your father and mother” (Exodus 20: 12); in the Qur’an: ((Your Lord has decreed) that you show kindness to your parents) (Al-Isra’ 17: 23).

5. In the Bible: “You shall not kill” (Exodus 20:13); in the Qur’an: (And kill not one another) (An-Nisa’ 4:29).

6. In the Bible: “You shall not commit adultery” (Exodus 20: 14); in the Qur’an: (Tell the believing men to lower their gaze and guard their private parts… And tell the believing women to lower their gaze and guard their private parts.) (An-Nur 24: 30-31)

7. In the Bible: “You shall not steal” (Exodus 20: 15); in the Qur’an: (They shall not steal) (Al-Mumtahanah 60: 12).

8. In the Bible: “You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor” (Exodus 20: 16); in the Qur’an: (You shall shun false testimony) (An-Nisa’ 4: 29).

9. In the Bible: “You shall not covet your neighbor’s house, you shall not covet you neighbor’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor anything that is your neighbor’s” (Exodus 20: 17); in the Qur’an: (Do not desire the things which Allah has given to some of you in preference to others) (An-Nisa’ 4: 32).

I added the above excerpt to make a point. That point is the core law. That law is now just as it has always been. It is the law for all three faiths. We should remember, as the Pharisees should have remembered, that we must not assume the name or faith of our God in vain. If we claim a connection to our God, his will must come before our own. Bloodlust or personal advantage of any stripe – these are of men, not God. If God sends a message, we should listen. If God sends a savior, we should seek him out. If God sends a bridge to a real connection, we should avail ourselves of that bridge. If we are given only one door, we should seek the key.

It is a sad testimonial that we who live in 2017 are not breaking down the doors to get close to Jesus. Any one of us who has walked the Avenue of the Americas at lunchtime knows with certainty just what an innumerable multitude of people is like. So – what, we can walk all over each other for a bite to eat, but not to get closer Christ? Who are we anyway? Those people in Luke 12:1 were poor, humble, and illiterate, but they knew enough to try that much to be near him. We, on the other hand, have substance, pride, and a surfeit of smarts. I wonder – have we out-smarted ourselves?

Of all the people who tried so hard to get next to Jesus, his disciples had to really work overtime to keep their place in the shadow of the son of God. They were so close they all but stepped on his toes. But, here is a secret about their closeness – their desire was shared by Jesus; the disciples desired to remain close to Jesus, and Jesus wanted them in just that place. When he came out, he spoke to them “first of all.” Folks were tripping over each other to be close to Jesus, and he could have spoken to all of them, but he did not.

Why were they the closest to Jesus? All of them believed and all of them desired to hear Jesus speak, but the disciples, above all others, desired to learn from Jesus a particular truth – one they could adopt and practice. That truth was how to be like Jesus. That truth was how to become the truth – how to approach and achieve the nature of the son of God and the relationship with God that Jesus was willing to teach.

Jesus does not exist to justify anyone's opinion of how the world should be, or who is right and who is wrong. He is not presently the judge of any one of us. That will happen when he returns as King. He said this in Luke 12:14, “Man, who made me a judge or a divider over you?” Who, indeed? God did not send him as a judge or divider but chose for him the role of teacher and example, of door and bridge. God sent Jesus as the one and only way that man could escape his self-induced exile and come home.

Will you get close to Jesus? In the year of our Lord 2017, will Jesus speak to you first of all? Will this be the year you open the door and cross over the bridge. Or, will you remain like the Pharisees – hypocrites?

Building Graves

In Luke 11:37-52, we find Jesus having been invited to dine with Pharisees and lawyers. Sort of a business luncheon. In the end, they were scheming to trap Jesus in his words, but I get the sense that in the beginning, the meal was no more than a polite courtesy. This kind of thing: 'Hey Jesus, you seem well received by the people; come and rub elbows with the big boys.'

Now, we are well accustomed to the bad blood between Jesus and the church authorities, but on this particular occasion, Jesus really laid into them. It was not just Jesus and the Pharisee who invited him, nor do I get the sense of a simple meal at home. There was more than one Pharisee and there was more than one lawyer in attendance. All the authority figures were there. It was practically a convention.

We may view the incident as a contest of wills – God's way versus man's way. And Jesus told them all they were doing in opposition to the will of God. In a sense, we are as guilty as the men Jesus spoke to. We embrace the customs of men, viewing them as common and ordinary. That's just how we do things; that's how we roll.

For anyone who claims a real connection with their God, not doing things the way their God wants them done is a no-no. “And many such things ye do,” said Jesus in Mark 7:13. Thus we nullify the word of God by our traditions. If we want to be right with God, we do not want to be those people. We may avoid sharing the guilt of those people by getting on the same page with God, by thinking and acting just the opposite of those Pharisees and lawyers who placed their authority above the authority of God.

What did they do that was against God? Mom always taught me to wash my hands before I eat. At work, as a cook, I am expected to have clean hands and wear sterile gloves when handling food. Makes perfect sense as bacteria are passed from dirty hands. But, I don't see those Pharisees as walking around touching things that were dirty. The Jewish rule was two-fold, don't touch things that are unclean, for one and for two, wash your hands anyway.

For the Pharisees, hand washing was a ritual matter. It was a practice meant to associate them with their God. Even today, we have a popular saying that goes, 'cleanliness is next to Godliness'. Jesus told them that the way of God was completely the reverse. First, make yourself clean in your heart and mind, then every other cleanliness will follow. The “inward part” of a human being, verse 39, can harbor a lot of awful uncleanness.

Synonyms for the word awful include disgusting, horrible, terrible, dreadful, ghastly, nasty, vile, foul, revolting, repulsive, repugnant, odious, sickening, nauseating and too much more. In fact, Jesus described them as unmarked graves that men walk across unawares. If men knew the dead were beneath their feet, they wouldn't stand on them and be made foul. Normal people, even without religious restrictions, simply don't like to touch what they consider nasty. It's like the Jew or Muslim that discovers someone secretly slipped pork into their mutton. There is a certain retroactive gag reflex.

Jesus laid it all out for them – every advantage they reserved for themselves was at the expense of someone else – whether cajoled or robbed or bullied into compliance. Every good thing withheld belied a willfully mean and stingy spirit. Every item given was a cheap and showy veneer meant to hide a multitude of weightier omissions.

Now, 'whoa!', said the lawyers, 'we all know that the Pharisees are a bunch of misfits, but you're slamming us as well.' Jesus told the lawyers (who were like teachers or philosophers of religion) that they were just as guilty – and Jesus had enough 'woes' to go around. Lawyers were the go-to people for facts and figures regarding how the law of God should be defined. They were like exalted scribes who got to pal around with the big boys.

Someone who gets to say what's what is always at high risk when in close proximity to power. Basically, this type is found among many races and tiers of society – both religious and non-religious. They try to limit those around them, impeding spiritual progress. Those things which lawyers push off on the common man are burdensome and grievous, yet lawyers are as guilty as the Pharisees for reserving a place of advantage for themselves at the expense of those they place beneath them.

Many people of our own day and age have the same spirit as a Pharisee or a lawyer. They share the same guilt for displacing God and doing their own thing, bringing those around them into subservience to a will that is theirs and theirs alone. In verse 47, Jesus accused the lawyers of building the graves of their prophets, as if a chess move destined for a heavy-handed checkmate. The prophets were their claim to fame, but it was their own fathers, as the lawyers of a former age, who killed them. Their words and actions, in effect, were self-damning.

Fast forward to our day and age where Catholics claim this saint or that – but who was it that killed Peter or Paul but the same central authority mindset seeking self-promotion and absolute advantage? Personally, I am put off by anyone who makes such a lofty claim. The saint of one man or the prophet of another matters not in the long run. The things that damn us are our own words and deeds. This is true because our own words and deeds are set against the will of God.

The Jew, the Christian, the Muslim and atheist are all the same. We have a penchant to war against and subjugate anyone unfortunate enough to stumble across our shiny new super highway. To anyone with the strength of heart to open his eyes, the picture ceases to be the super highway and proves itself to be just another variation of the small dirt path.

There is no standard among us; we know only our own willful sense of self. It's 'me, me, me, and damn the contrary opinion'. One and only one standard may be found in the will of God. This is not open to the viewpoint of any one religion, and it is certainly not meant to be interpreted as the will of God apart from man. It is the will of such a spirit that would take on our very face to explain those things we need to know. It is the will of such a God who would send mankind a savior – not a savior who derides or destroys, but one who at great personal risk demonstrates the greater power of love and redemption.